There are so many easy reasons to be a pessimist today: the world financial crisis, the discord and dysfunction in Washington, and the almost certain doom that many scientists claim we are facing from global warming. With the first high profile cleantech company failures, the euphoria of the cleantech bubble has burst creating pessimism about the future of cleantech as a whole.
I say, hogwash! History says we have many reasons to be optimistic. Just because things look bad today doesn’t mean the world is coming to an end! We humans have a hard time stepping back and getting a perspective on things that span long periods of time and it’s easy to get lost in the fear and distress of the day. But as a cleantech venture capitalist, I am almost required to be optimistic. How else could I make high-risk investments in early stage companies?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e68f/9e68f99b7210787230b75261fe6f568923a224f4" alt=""
Pessimists will point to forecasts such as those from the Energy Information Administration that project significantly slower growth. The most recent of those very projections just three short years ago forecast consumption for 2010 that now, by EIA’s own numbers, are known to be about 17% low! The problem with forecasts of these types is that they systematically fail to account for future disruptive technologies or significant changes to market conditions.
In 2001 it seemed like the days of the dot com were gone as the markets crashed and company after company went out of business. Yet, the greatest value creation on the Web occurred after the dot bomb. I don't believe we are doomed; I believe that technology innovation will enable disruptive changes in our energy production and consumption and I believe the greatest value creation for cleantech companies lies ahead.
So, to cheer you up, here are just a handful of examples in which past forecasts of doom were way off and whose combined legacy says, " Don't underestimate the power of human innovation and spirit!"...
We Never Had to Import Liquefied Natural Gas
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c9cb/0c9cb84a37f3413e20b914891d03d3191918068e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/295f8/295f854143c0f6798408b453c5cd42bf2565a1f9" alt=""
In 2003, Alan Greenspan sounded the alarm to Congress about the potential impact on natural gas prices (which were already on the rise) if significant action to increase imports wasn’t taken. The problem, though, was that natural gas can only be transported by pipeline or by container and only in a liquid form, but the reserves were mostly overseas. So, in 2005 there were plans for as many as 55 Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)-importing facilities. Only six were built, and most sit idle today. Disruptive horizontal drilling and fracking technology opened up enormous reserves of previously unreachable natural gas in shale. Production skyrocketed and prices dropped by over 60%. Current estimates place U.S. reserves at 100 years or more…without additional technology.
Disruptive Lighting
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/883c9/883c937e87ae42dd2e0e100e195d516d3ffb7182" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4269/a4269e6cc30962047fb05483dc005f9a45d40b01" alt=""
The Population Bomb Didn’t Explodedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f37/f7f3795783c52ca41f781fa6c581c5246aee2874" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f37/f7f3795783c52ca41f781fa6c581c5246aee2874" alt=""
In the 1960s predictions of world starvation by the 1980s were rampant in books like the best-selling The Population Bomb by Paul R. Ehrlich or theorists like Thomas Malthus. After all, back then world population was going to double every 30 years or so, meaning we should have had over 11 billion people in the world today! Yet, world population just reached 7 billion.
World population growth rates are now less than half what they were in the early ‘60s and continuing to decline. Based on today’s population growth rate and the continued forecasted decline, it will take about 100 years for human population to double again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa727/fa727a02866eb2559d8592f740b65e2ab85f1cdf" alt=""
200 Countries, 200 Years…
Pessimists will surely find reasons to pan this article… for example, concerns about fracking fluids or the disparity in food distribution around the world. A pessimist sees these as reasons to stay pessimistic. An optimist sees them as new areas where we as humans will work to improve. So, if you are still feeling depressed and pessimistic, I will leave you with one of the more profound and optimistic views on world progress that I have seen. Hans Rosling is a professor of International Health at Karolinska Institute in Stockhom and his video 200 Countries, 200 Years is a sure cure for any pessimistic day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01983/01983fbb3328cb790691112818300b41d1718da8" alt=""